|
2 - 11
DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) IN APPLES IN THE
BOHAI BAY AREA, CHINA
|
1. Project Summary and Relationship to China's Agenda
21
The IPM for apple aims at guaranteeing sustainable
utilisation of natural resources and minimising disturbance
to the ecosystem by adopting a series of technologies, which
will harmonising the bio-factors in the orchard ecosystem and
make full use of its self-adjusting mechanism. The project
will create opportunities for farmers to learn such
technologies and encourage their participation into this
project.
This project is based on programme areas 11E, and is
related to programme areas of 11B, 11F and 9B of China's
Agenda 21.
2. Background
Recent experiences on IPM from some Southeast Asian
countries have shown that IPM will not work if it is only
"provided" or lectured on by scientists or plant
protection specialists to farmers, nor can it be transferred
directly from other countries. IPM is site-specific and is
only meaningful if it is implemented by farmers themselves.
The modern concept of IPM is therefore characterised with the
principles of (1)growing a healthy crop, (2) conserving
natural enemies, (3) observing field situation for decision
making and (4) farmers become IPM experts.
The area selected for this proposed project covers three
provinces (Shandong, Henan and Hebei) surrounding the Bohai.
Agriculture represents the largest sector of human and
economic activity for these provinces, they produce over 20%
of the national gross value of agriculture. The natural
conditions in this area are suitable for apple growth. During
the most recent decade, Its apple production has been
increasing by 10% annually, accounting for over 50% of the
total national apple production in 1994.
In the recent years, the national and local governments
have been seriously concerned with the environmental and
resource problems associated with the over-use and/or abuse
of agrochemical in agricultural development, particularly
apple-centred production systems. These problems include soil
degradation, water pollution, rapid increase of pest
resistance to pesticides, new pesticide-induced pest problems
and the deterioration of the indigenous biological diversity.
There is a substantial knowledge base built in China on
the biology, ecology and control methods of major apple
pests. Individual components of IPM against such key pests as
apple canker, peach fruit moth, etc. have been developed and
tried in experimental orchards. Nonetheless, IPM remains
limited to small scale experimental orchardís, and
remains the concern of researchers and extension specialists,
not farmers. There are a number of reasons for this, but the
main attributing factors include: the heavily top-down
approach for research and technology transfer in which
farmers are usually not actively involved in the development
process of the IPM programme; a lack of quantitative study
and understanding of the ecosystem, its abiotic and biotic
components and their interactions as the foundation for many
of the IPM programmes; and a general lack of awareness of the
value of natural resources among local government officials,
extensionists and farmers, so that environmental degradation
caused by over use of chemical pesticides is not considered
the highest cost of production.
3. Objectives
3.1 Long-term Objective
The long-term objective of the proposed project is to
promote sustainable agricultural development, develop the IPM
in which farmers are the major participants in Bohai Bay
region.
3.2 Immediate Objectives:
- To develop site-specific IPM systems in line with the
natural conditions in the Bohai Bay region;
- To establish apple IPM Farmer Field Schools;
- To teach and embed the IPM technologies in over 90%
farmers in this region.
4. Outputs and Activities
4.1 Detailed technical requirements for improving apple
production and farmer IPM training
- To study the main diseases, insect pests, their
occurrence and damage levels in different environment,
then propose specific strategies for carrying out IPM;
- To study population dynamics of the dominant pest and
natural enemy species, impact of natural enemies on
insect pests and chemical spray on natural enemies; then
develop strategies and methods for conserving and
maximising the effect of natural enemies;
- To work out a practical training plan on the base of
analysis of farmers' pest control practices, their
knowledge and attitudes towards IPM, requirements of new
technology and knowledge;
- To identify the agrochemical and fertilisers consumption,
assess the environment (such as soil , ground water,
fauna and flora in and around orchards, etc.) quality and
propose a risk evaluation report, monitoring indicators
and methods.
Monitoring Indicators: Detailed survey reports; IPM
executive plan and development tactics for specific sites;
impact evaluation and economic analysis of the production
system and the environment.
Implementing Agencies: Chinese Academy of Agricultural
Sciences, Hebei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong
Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of
Agricultural Sciences,
Time Schedule: January 1997- December 2002
4.2 Development of site-specific IPM technologies for
green products
- Development and field tests of existing bio-control
technologies and methods for conserving natural enemies
and using bio-pesticides; evaluation of the impacts of
these bio-control agents.
- Quantitative comparison and integration of the
biological, ecological, cultural and chemical components
for IPM in apple orchards; Evaluation of the
cost-benefits of different pest control plans at specific
apple ecosystems, including economical, social and
ecological benefits from IPM practice.
- Optimise individual IPM technologies against key pests
for specific orchard region;
- To establish IPM technical frameworks based on above
studies for large-scale demonstration.
Monitoring Indicators: IPM field demonstration on 5,000 ha
in 6 counties within 3 years, 20,000 ha in 20 counties within
5 years, reduction of chemical use by 50%~70%, new IPM system
for apple.
Implementing Agency: Chinese Academy of Agricultural
Sciences
Time Schedule: January 1997 - December 2002
4.3 Curriculum development for apple IPM training of
trainers (TOT) and farmer field schools (FFS)
- Production of an apple IPM training manual in Chinese for
use by the master trainers and extensionists;
- Establishment of FFS in which apple farmers will learn
the role of natural enemies, bio-eco-control
technologies, IPM principles and technologies;
establishment of a network to feed back problems in the
process of carrying out the IPM;
- Organisation of TOT courses for extensionists who will
become master trainers for apple farmers.
- Comparative research in both orchards and laboratories by
researchers and farmers jointly, especially in response
to problems found in the field, and development of
site-specific IPM systems based on such focused research
for implementation by farmers.
Monitoring Indicators: an IPM manual; 1000 extension
specialists and master trainers, training of over 90% of
farmer in each county.
Implementing Agencies: Chinese Academy of Agricultural
Sciences, Hebei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong
Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of
Agricultural Sciences.
Time Schedule: January 1997 - December 2002.
4.4 Perfect IPM technologies and exchange information
within and beyond project provinces/sites
- To facilitate information exchange among researchers,
extensionists and farmers by developing and making widely
available an apple IPM database.
- To analyse the apple market and its tendency, and to
provide the participating farmers with marking guidance.
- Publicity of outcomes of the FFS IPM and benefits of the
IPM farmers through public media, field visits by
officials of the local and national governments, to
demonstrate the impact and experience of the IPM
programme to the adjacent counties and provinces.
- To develop a new pattern for rural community concerning
the farmerís welfare, social and agricultural
development, environmental conservation and natural
resource management.
Monitoring Indicators: an IPM database established, up to
20,000 farmers in 20 counties trained.
Implementing Agencies: Chinese Academy of Agricultural
Sciences, Hebei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shandong
Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan Academy of
Agricultural Sciences,
Time Schedule: January 1997 - December 2002.
5. Inputs
5.1 Chinese Inputs
Chinese input will be used for project management, salary
and transportation costs for Chinese researchers; research
facilities and collection of references, data and
information.
5.2 International Inputs
International input will be used for technical assistance,
technical consulting services, operation of the TOT and FFS
training, communication, and equipment.
5.3 Budget
The total capital needed for this project is US$ 8.51
million. The Chinese participants will raise US$ 3.60 million
from domestic sources, while foreign aid will cover the other
US$ 4.91 million.
Table 1. Budget by Item (in million US
dollars)
Item
|
Total
|
Chinese
Inputs
|
International
Inputs
|
Subtotal
|
Grant
|
Loan
|
Local
Contribution
|
Subtotal
|
Grant
|
Loan
|
Direct
Investment
|
International
Expert
|
1.45
|
0.40
|
0.40
|
|
|
1.05
|
1.05
|
|
|
Chinese Expert
|
0.19
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
|
|
0.09
|
0.09
|
|
|
Training
|
4.62
|
2.00
|
2.00
|
|
|
2.62
|
2.62
|
|
|
Technical
Implement
|
0.83
|
0.45
|
0.35
|
|
0.10
|
0.38
|
0.38
|
|
|
Project
Management
|
0.32
|
0.15
|
0.15
|
|
|
0.17
|
0.17
|
|
|
Reporting &
Meetings
|
0.19
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
|
|
0.09
|
0.09
|
|
|
Operational
Costs
|
0.53
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
|
|
0.33
|
0.33
|
|
|
Contingency
|
0.38
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
|
|
0.18
|
0.18
|
|
|
Total
|
8.51
|
3.60
|
3.50
|
|
0.10
|
4.91
|
4.91
|
|
|
Table 2 Budget by Output (in million US
dollars)
Output
|
Total
|
Chinese
Input
|
International
Input
|
Subtotal
|
Grant
|
Loan
|
Local
Contribution
|
Subtotal
|
Grant
|
Loan
|
Direct
Investment
|
4.1
|
2.02
|
0.86
|
0.86
|
|
|
1.16
|
1.16
|
|
|
4.2
|
2.60
|
1.20
|
1.10
|
|
0.10
|
1.40
|
1.40
|
|
|
4.3
|
2.20
|
0.90
|
0.90
|
|
|
1.30
|
1.30
|
|
|
4.4
|
1.69
|
0.64
|
0.64
|
|
|
1.05
|
1.05
|
|
|
Total
|
8.51
|
3.60
|
3.50
|
|
0.10
|
4.91
|
4.91
|
|
|
6. Benefit
This project will stimulate the development of the
demonstration areas and the surrounding regions, improve
livelihood of rural communities, decrease the frequency of
the pest occurrence by about 62.5%~70.9%, reduce the
agrochemical by 20%~38.5%. The cost to benefit ratio is about
1:3.3~5.4. The project will also increase farmer's enthusiasm
and confidence in agriculture and orchard production, hence
increase social and economic stability of the rural
community.
7. Risks
The proposed project will be executed by the Chinese
Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) and in co-operation
with involved provincial academies and plant protection
stations. Well-trained professionals will be needed. Thus,
FAO experts and Chinese IPM researchers will be engaged as
technical advisors and technical assistants.
Chinese funding is not enough to support the project,
there is a need of international input for the project
complement and achieving the expected objectives. The project
will be linked with IPM implementation activities of the
Global IPM Facility.
Text Browser Utilities: |Back| |ACCA21
Home|
|