|
3 - 7
DEVELOPMENT, APPLICATION AND COMMERCIALISATION OF COAL-FIRED FLUE GAS DESULPHURISATION TECHNOLOGY
|
1. Project Summary and Relationship to China Agenda 21
This project seeks to import desulphurisation technology
suitable for China and to get support and co-operation from
international finance organisations and developed countries.
Specifically, China needs SO2 controlling techniques that can
be applied in power plants, industrial boilers and other
furnaces. In addition, SO2 emitters need to improve their
operating process by reducing installation and operation
costs of desulphurisation technologies. The project also
plans to implement a retrofitting pilot project for burning
coal flue gas desulphurisation technology on existing Chinese
equipment. In the policy-making area, this project will be a
suitable economic instrument in desulphurisation. Finally,
the project aims to commercialise the desulphurisation
equipment and technology. All these efforts will improve the
air quality in China.
This project is based on programme area 18A of China
Agenda 21, and is related to programme areas 13C and 12B.
2. Background
China ranks first in the production and consumption of
coal in the world. It is the primary energy source because
China has an abundance of coal and is a developing nation.
Coal will still play an important role in social and economic
development in the foreseeable future.
At present, 500,000 sets of coal burning equipment are
used in China with an annual SO2 emission of 1,800 tons,
which accounts for 90% of the total emission of SO2. Coal
burning power plants alone are responsible for one-third of
the SO2 discharged. Adding to the fact that with Chinese
industry developing at the speed of 10% in the last ten
years, the emission of SO2 will seriously degrade air quality
if the situation is not controlled effectively.
The continuous increase of SO2 emission has worsened the
acid rain problem in some local regions, and has aroused
close attention from the international community. The major
problem of SO2 emission is that China lacks suitable
technology for its power plants and boilers.
Environmental protection has always been a priority for
the government. An emission concentration limit for SO2 has
been set in the amendments of the Emission Standard of Air
Pollutant From Boilers and Emission Standard of Air Pollutant
From Power Plant in 1991. In 1993, the National Environmental
Protection Agency (NEPA), approved by the State Council,
began to levy fines on SO2 emissions from burning coal and
carried out a pilot study on acid rain prevention and control
in Guizhou, Guangdong provinces, and in Liuzhou, Nanning,
Guilin, Hangzhou, Qingdao, Chongqing, Yibin, Yichang, and
Changsha cities. The Amendment of Law on Air Pollution
Prevention and Control, passed by the National People's
Congress in August 1995, has a clear direction on controlling
SO2 emission, which stated:
"All the new coal
fire power plants and major enterprises that emit SO2 and
cannot use low sulphur content coal in the acid rain control
zone or the SO2 emission control zone must install scrubbers
or other sulphur removal measures to control SO2
emission."
The Seventh and Eighth Five-Year Plan has listed several
power plants requiring desulphurisation technology
development, including: Spray Dryer Absorber Flue Gas
Desulphurisation (FGD) for mid-stage equipment of the Sichuan
Baima Power Plant with a capacity of 70,000 NM3/h;
Phosphorous Fertiliser Method for the mid-stage equipment of
the 5,000 NM3/h capacity Sichuan Douba Power Plant; the
Injection in Furnace with Calcium and Dampness Activation
technique was applied to the 20 t/h industrial boilers.
Despite the fact that all these techniques are in the
research stage with some technical problems, they lay a good
foundation for continued investigation on desulphurisation
technique and policy applicable for China.
After 1990, some desulphurisation techniques were imported
from abroad, such as Limestone-Plaster and Spray Dryer
Absorber Desulphurisation techniques from MITSUBISHI, High
Speed Flow with Dampness from HITACHI, Electron Beam
Radiation technique from RENYUAN Japan, and EDSS technique
from ALANKOU (USA) company. All of them have been installed
or are in a trial operation in China.
However, because imported desulphurisation equipment and
techniques are complex and expensive, they are hard to
promote. Therefore, in order to push the progress of SO2
emission control, the project seeks to enhance co-operation
with the international society, seek financial and technical
support from abroad, and research, develop and commercialise
suitable desulphurisation techniques for China. Necessary
economic measures will be formulated to reduce SO2 emission.
3. Objectives
3.1 Long-term Objective
The project aims to strengthen the enterprises ability in
desulphurising the flue gas from coal combustion. It also
plans to fully implement the Air Pollution Control Law and
reduce loss caused by acid rain.
3.2 Immediate Objectives
- To survey the current status of SO2 emissions from coal
combustion and desulphurisation, to evaluate the
mainstream desulphurisation technology, and to formulate
favourable economic instruments towards flue gas
desulphurisation;
- To import advanced technologies, equipment and expertise,
to research FGD technology which is suitable for China,
and to establish several demonstration projects;
- To commercialise appropriate desulphurisation technology
which will enable China to produce desulphurisation
equipment domestically.
4. Outputs and Activities
4.1 General survey on the current desulphurisation
technologies and their effectiveness in China
- To organise domestic experts to examine the various
desulphurisation techniques used in the power plants and
other industrial boilers, and evaluate their
corresponding effectiveness;
- To evaluate various desulphurisation techniques based on
the above techniques. The evaluation will concentrate on
cost-effectiveness and technical problems;
- To suggest a suitable technical policy.
Monitoring Indicators: The survey report on the
desulphurisation methods and their effects.
Implementing Agencies: NEPA, the Ministry of Electric
Power, the State Economic and Trade Commission and other
relevant units.
Time Schedule: January 1997 - December 1998
4.2 Pilot projects for large power plant desulphurisation
- To convene domestic and foreign experts to discuss
desulphurisation techniques used in large power plants
with 300 MW and 600 MW capacity. They will also discuss
regulations, financing and operations;
- To conduct pilot projects for the several identified
techniques. The pilot projects will provide experimental
and technical data, which are necessary for replicating
in other power plants and boilers;
- To conduct technical training and information exchange
based on the pilot projects.
Monitoring Indicators: 3-5 desulphurisation demonstration
projects will be set-up in large power plants, and 10 power
plants will be chosen for replicating this technology.
Implementing Agencies: The State Economic and Trade
Commission, the Ministry of Electric Power and the related
demonstration units.
Time Schedule: January 1997 - December 2000
4.3 The research and development of simple burning coal
FGD techniques and pilot projects
- To research and conduct pilot projects on the simple wet
desulphurisation technique;
- To research and conduct pilot projects on the manufacture
of another desulphurisation technique, and the injection
calcimine furnace;
- To import and conduct pilot projects on the Spray Dryer
Absorber FGD technique.
Monitoring Indicators: 3-6 demonstration projects
Implementing Agencies: The Ministry of Electric Power,
NEPA, the State Economic and Trade Commission as well as
demonstration units.
Time Schedule: January 1997 - December 2000
4.4 Formation of manufacturing ability to produce a
complete set of desulphurisation equipment for the domestic
market
- To choose appropriate enterprises to produce
desulphurisation equipment through joint ventures with
foreign partners;
- To mass produce the equipment and develop domestic and
south-east Asian markets;
- To train managers and technicians who operate plants
which will produce desulphurisation equipment.
Monitoring Indicators: 10 environmental protection
enterprises with the ability to produce desulphurisation
equipment.
Implementing Agencies: the Ministry of Mechanics, the
Ministry of Electric Power and relevant units.
Time Schedule: January 1997 - December 2005
4.5 Formulation of economic policy for FGD technology
suitable for China
- To employ international experts to provide advice on
international energy policy, tax policy, customs duty,
and desulphurisation techniques;
- To formulate policy that would control foreign currency
for desulphurisation project and would reduce customs
duty for key components of imported desulphurisation
equipment;
- To draft policies that include desulphurisation cost in
electricity pricing and establishment of a SO2 control
fund.
Monitoring Indicator: Establishment of economic policy for
FGD technique in China
Implementing Agencies: The State Economic and Trade
Commission, the Ministry of Electric Power and relevant
units.
Time Schedule: January 1997 - December 1998
5. Inputs
5.1 Chinese Inputs
Chinese inputs will be used for technology, office
facilities, part of the equipment as well as the cost of
research and training.
5.2 International Inputs
International inputs will be used for the cost of
technology and equipment in demonstration projects, cost of
part of the instrument and training for the project.
5.3 Budget
The total capital needed for this project is US$ 69.7
million. The Chinese participants will raise US$ 38.4
million, while foreign aid and investment will cover the
other US$ 31.3 million.
Table 1. Budget by Item (in million US
dollars)
| Item |
Total |
Chinese Inputs |
International Inputs |
| Subtotal |
Grant |
Loan |
Local
Contribution |
Subtotal |
Grant |
Loan |
Direct
Investment |
| Experts |
1.50 |
0.50 |
0.40 |
|
0.10 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
|
| Training |
1.30 |
0.30 |
0.20 |
|
0.10 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
|
Research
on Policy
and
Technology |
1.80 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
|
0.80 |
0.80 |
|
|
Procurement
of
Facilities |
53.00 |
31.00 |
2.00 |
25.00 |
4.00 |
22.00 |
|
20.00 |
2.00 |
Production
of
Desulphurisation
Equipment |
12.10 |
5.60 |
2.00 |
3.00 |
0.60 |
6.50 |
0.50 |
|
6.00 |
| Total |
69.70 |
38.40 |
5.60 |
28.00 |
4.80 |
31.30 |
3.30 |
20.00 |
8.00 |
Table 2. Budget by Output (in million
US dollars)
| Output |
Total |
Chinese Inputs |
International Inputs |
| Subtotal |
Grant |
Loan |
Local
Contribution |
Subtotal |
Grant |
Loan |
Direct
Investment |
| 4.1 |
0.70 |
0.40 |
0.40 |
|
|
0.30 |
0.30 |
|
|
| 4.2 |
41.00 |
25.00 |
2.00 |
20.00 |
3.00 |
16.00 |
1.00 |
15.00 |
|
| 4.3 |
14.60 |
6.60 |
0.60 |
5.00 |
1.00 |
8.00 |
1.00 |
5.00 |
2.00 |
| 4.4 |
12.30 |
5.80 |
2.00 |
3.00 |
0.80 |
6.50 |
0.50 |
|
6.00 |
| 4.5 |
1.10 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
|
|
0.50 |
0.50 |
|
|
| Total |
69.70 |
38.40 |
5.60 |
28.00 |
4.80 |
31.30 |
3.30 |
20.00 |
8.00 |
6. Benefits
After the completion of this project, SO2 emission will
basically be under control through international co-operation
in desulphurisation development. In addition, because some of
the desulphurisation technologies have low capital and
operating cost, they can reduce the government and
enterprises' appropriation. The development would reduce the
loss caused by SO2 emission. The pilot projects for
desulphurisation equipment production would increase the
technical level and productivity in desulphurisation. This
provides a good foundation for entering foreign markets and
controlling SO2 emission.
7. Risks
This project is faced with two difficulties: capital and
technology. The initial investment and operation costs are
quite high for desulphurisation. Therefore, responsible
agencies will try to obtain government loans and
international aid for retro-fitting technology and new
desulphurisation technology. In addition, because the
desulphurisation technology in China is still immature, the
implementing agencies would integrate foreign advanced
technology with domestic requirements to solve this problem.
Text Browser Utilities: |Back| |ACCA21
Home|
|